Superposition · Stationary Waves
Stationary Waves Lab
Formation by the graphical method
y₁ = A sin(kx − ωt) · y₂ = A sin(kx + ωt)Two identical waves, opposite directions — and their sum
t / T
0.000
cos ωt
1.000
resultant amplitude
0.300 m
× each wave's A
2.00 ×
Time scrubber
y₁ and y₂ are in phase everywhere — full constructive, double amplitude.
ⓘ more
Controls
f = v/λ
2.00 Hz
T = λ/v
0.500 s
node spacing λ/2
0.500 m
Each wave has A = 0.15 m fixed, so the resultant maxes at 2A = 0.30 m.
Do the nodes ever move?
predicted nodes m·λ/2
9 in view
zeros measured now
all x
worst node drift
0.0000 m
watched for
0.000 s
measured x: — every point is a zero at the flat instant
ⓘ more
Window 4.0m wide. Both component waves have identical A, λ and v — that is what "identical waves" means in the syllabus statement.
Vibrating systems and harmonics
f = v/λMeasurement overlay
ⓘ more
System
String, fixed both ends — node at both ends.
Every whole-number harmonic fits, so the series is f₁, 2f₁, 3f₁, …
Controls
λ = 2L/h
0.667 m
f = v/λ
510 Hz
f / f₁
3.00 ×
ⓘ more
Spacing measured off the markers
nodes in mode
4
antinodes in mode
3
N → N
0.333 m
A → A
0.333 m
N → nearest A
0.167 m
λ/4
0.167 m
λ/2 = 0.333 m · N→N ÷ (λ/2) = 1.000 · N→A ÷ (λ/4) = 1.000
Phase check inside the stationary wave
1 node between → odd → ψ(x₁)·ψ(x₂) < 0
ψ(x₁) · s₁/a₀ now
0.809 · 0.809
ψ(x₂) · s₂/a₀ now
-0.891 · -0.891
ⓘ more
Progressive vs stationary
P = −T (∂y/∂x)(∂y/∂t)Energy transfer — measured, not asserted
⟨P⟩ of y₁ alone
0.000 W
⟨P⟩ of y₂ alone
0.000 W
⟨P⟩ of y₁ + y₂
0.0000 W
averaged over whole cycles
— s
P of y₁ right now
0.000 W
P of y₂ right now
0.000 W
P of resultant now
0.000 W
|⟨P⟩ net| ÷ |⟨P⟩ of one wave|
0.0e+0
Each travelling wave carries power one way (0.000 W measured against the analytic ½TA²kω = 0.000W). Their superposition carries none: the resultant's instantaneous power swings hard both ways and integrates to zero.
ⓘ more
Power crossing one cross-section of a string is P = −T (∂y/∂x)(∂y/∂t), integrated here by midpoint substeps inside the animation loop with tension T = 10.0 N at x = 0.000m — a point λ/8 from a node, chosen so the resultant's instantaneous power is at full swing rather than trivially zero. Each frame is split at exact period boundaries so the average always covers complete cycles. Energy is not destroyed: it sloshes between kinetic and potential inside each loop, but no loop ever hands energy to the next.
The other four rows of the comparison
| Feature | Progressive wave | Stationary wave |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | Transfers energy along the direction of travel. | No net energy transfer — see the measured ⟨P⟩ above. |
| Amplitude | Every particle has the same amplitude A. | Amplitude depends on position: 0 at a node, 2A at an antinode. |
| Phase | Neighbouring particles are out of step: Δφ = 2πΔx/λ takes any value. | Only two answers exist: in phase within a loop, antiphase across a node. |
| Waveform | The profile advances one λ every period. | The profile stays put and only changes size; nodes never move. |
| Wavelength | Distance between adjacent particles in phase. | Twice the node-to-node distance (λ = 2 × N→N). |
| Frequency | Every particle vibrates at the source frequency. | Every particle vibrates at the same frequency, except the nodes, which never move. |
Resonance tube and the end correction
L + c = (2n − 1)λ/4Fixed frequency, adjustable air column
quietThe air above the rim still moves, so the antinode sits c beyond the mouth, not at it.
ⓘ more
Loudness against air-column length
ⓘ more
Driver and tube
λ = v/f
0.6641 m
λ/4
0.1660 m
c = 0.6 r
12.0 mm
ⓘ more
Air column
amplitude ÷ peak
10.2 %
level re peak
-19.9 dB
L + c
0.1120 m
(L + c) ÷ (λ/4)
0.675
nearest resonance n = 1 at L = 0.154 m · you are -54.0 mm short of it
ⓘ more
Marks → λ, v and c
No marks yet. Find the first loud length and mark it.
ⓘ more
What this confirms
- Formation by superposition — LO 12(a), 12(d). Station 1 draws two identical waves travelling in opposite directions and adds them point by point. The bold curve is the literal sum, never the collapsed 2A sin kx cos ωt identity, so the standing pattern is a result of the addition.
- The canonical T/8 sequence — LO 12(d) "graphical method". t = 0: the two waves coincide, resultant 2A. t = T/4: they are antiphase at every point and the string is completely flat. t = T/2: coincident again but inverted, −2A. The amplitude readout shows the ×2A factor collapsing to 0 and back.
- Nodes are pinned — LO 12(d) "identify nodes and antinodes". The zeros of the resultant are found by bisection every frame and compared with the predicted m·λ/2. The worst drift stays at the numerical tolerance for the whole run, while the loops flip up and down between them.
- λ/2 and λ/4 spacings — LO 12(d). The brackets subtract computed marker positions: node to node and antinode to antinode both equal λ/2, node to nearest antinode equals λ/4. The ratio readouts sit at 1.000 for every mode and every system.
- Harmonics of a string — LO 12(c) "stretched strings". Fixed ends force a node at each end, so only λ = 2L/n fits and f_n = n·f₁. Every whole harmonic exists; the L and v sliders move f = v/λ live.
- Closed pipe: odd harmonics only — LO 12(c) "air columns". A displacement node at the closed end and an antinode at the open end forces λ = 4L/(2n−1). The selector shows the even harmonics struck out because they cannot satisfy both boundary conditions, and f₁ = v/4L is an octave below the open pipe of the same length.
- Open pipe: antinodes at both ends — LO 12(c). λ = 2L/n and the full harmonic series returns, so the same L gives double the fundamental of the closed pipe.
- Longitudinal reality behind the transverse picture — LO 12(c). The air particles oscillate along the pipe and bunch up at displacement nodes, which is why those points are pressure antinodes. The green curve is the same displacement plotted sideways so its zeros are visible.
- No net energy transfer — Station 3. P = −T (∂y/∂x)(∂y/∂t) is integrated numerically. One travelling wave gives a one-signed average matching ½TA²kω; the superposition averages to zero at a point where its instantaneous power swings at full amplitude.
- Phase inside a stationary wave — LO 12(b). Two placeable markers report the sign of ψ(x₁)·ψ(x₂) alongside the count of nodes between them. Same loop gives Δφ = 0, across one node gives Δφ = π, and no intermediate value is ever produced — unlike a progressive wave, where Δφ = 2πΔx/λ takes any value.
- End correction — LO 12(c), and the resonance-tube experiment. Station 4 drives a closed tube at fixed f and varies the air column. Resonance is detected where the driven amplitude peaks, and those peaks land at L + c = (2n − 1)λ/4 with the antinode drawn c beyond the rim, where the air is still moving. Marking two of them gives λ = 2(L₂ − L₁), which matches v/f because c subtracts out, while λ = 4L₁ misses by 4c — the percentage error is printed alongside. c itself is then recovered from (L₂ − 3L₁)/2 and agrees with the 0.6 r that was used.